Research Based Argument - The Necessity of Capital Punishment Essay

Research Based Argument - The Necessity of Capital punishment - Essay ExampleThe stunning revelation in the article is that in the State of California, the annual lawful costs related to capital punishment are estimated at $184 million. Also, it is claimed that by replacing death punishment with life sentences, this amount can be brought down to just $ 11.5 million. Admittedly, this claim Fagan makes seems attractive only to most hardcore do-gooders. People with a sane mind will easily identify that the lives of the citizens in a country cannot be put into jeopardy for economic benefits. It can be admitted that capital punishment invites elongated legal jargons in the forms of appeals and reviews. However, one has to remember the fact that this delay and higher expenditure only shows the ineffectuality of our legal system not the ineffectiveness of capital punishment. So, it is evidently irrational to set serial killers apologise to save the money spent on legal works. Also, as Nugent argues, locking up such raving mad shooters in jails for the rest of their lifetime will cost taxpayers millions of dollars. One is forced to think whether it would not be a better administration of evaluator if the killer is executed and this millions of dollars are remunerative as allowance to the next of kin of the victims. Moreover, as Nugent points appear, it costs only a 25 cent bullet to extinguish the outlaw in cases like the Tucson shootout. If any money more than that is spent on legal battles, it is the justice system to be blamed not capital punishment. Also, the figures put forward by Fagan are below criticism for lack of evidence. In fact, the work Death penalty and sentencing information by Sharp points out that life without parole (LWOP) is nearly $1.2 to $3.6 million more expensive than death penalty. An other(a) minor parentage seen in the article of Fagan is that sometimes the society seems as guilty as the culprit in accredited crimes. For exampl e, the killer of a 22 year old female is found to be mentally unsteady and brain-damaged. The investigation proves that the killer had a very horrible upbringing as a child as he had his birth as an impoverished Mono tribe American Indian. Also, he was taken apart from his alcoholic parents at a very early age and was molested and abused in foster homes and other institutions. As a result, he was addicted to heroin and other drugs by the time he glum 5. Thus, Fagan argues that in such cases, giving capital punishment to the criminal is unjustifiable as the culprit is not guiltier than the family and society he lives in. It is with this insight that the article says that if capital punishment is replaced with life imprisonment, you would also run no chance of executing an innocent person (Fagan). However, the fact is that laymen or the citizens of a country cannot bear the brunt of position mentally deranged people free. For example, Nugent writes in The Washington Times about th e Tucson shootout which killed six and wound 13. As Fagan argues in his article, in this case too, the culprit was mentally deranged. As a result, he is way out to spend the rest of his life in the comfort of jail eating up the tax paid by obedient citizens. As Nugent argues, you dont need to be an overpaid prison psychologist to determine that (the criminal is mentally deranged) no